Talk:HTML-Kit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Computing / Software  
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
 

This article has survived a Votes for Deletion debate. The entire debate is at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/HTML Kit. Sjakkalle 09:04, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I notice user:Soumyasch has added a notability tag out of the blue and I deduce he is the editor expressing concern since nobody else has edited the article since January. Perhaps he should read the comments in the previous deletion request back in 2005. Nothing has changed since then apart from HTML-Kit becoming even more popular and established. I vote that the tag is deleted... Dsergeant 18:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Is this software freeware? It asks for money on its webpage although there seems to be no restriction on using the software if you don't pay.

Build 292 is free, but a few (very few) of the extensions are only available for download if you pay and register. Build 300, currently still in development, is only available to those who have registered and it is not clear at the moment if this will change when it is fully released. Dsergeant 05:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Ad cleanup[edit]

I removed and edited ad-like material and removed Features Summary altogether, because it was copy from http://www.chami.com/html-kit/features/ and any way quite messy list. --Usp (talk) 07:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Update Needed[edit]

This page is in strong need of an update; HTML-Kit Tools (Build 300) has been released for a while now, but it's still listed as alpha. Neard 03:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neard (talkcontribs)

I must have missed the formal release. It still seems that Tools is in development with frequent updates, and I thought it was now officially Beta but it seems not. Many of us prefer the free build 292 which is very stable and works well - and doesn't need .NET. Myself I did try Tools a while back and didn't like it. Suggest you update as you feel fit, but please leave build 292 there as well as MANY will still be continuing with that. Dsergeant (talk) 06:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HTML-Kit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)